Research
Existence and Mass Gap in Quantum Yang-Mills Theory
This paper addresses one of the most profound challenges at the intersection of mathematical physics and pure mathematics, known as the Yang-Mills existence and mass gap problem. This is one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems posed by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. At its heart, the problem asks two fundamental questions about Yang-Mills theories, which form the cornerstone of our understanding of fundamental forces in particle physics:
Existence: Can we rigorously prove that these theories are mathematically well-defined in four-dimensional spacetime?
Mass Gap: Can we prove that these theories predict particles with positive masses, with no massless particles except those required by gauge symmetry?
By leveraging recasting Yang-Mills theory using concepts from quantum information theory, we can represent Yang-Mills theory as a complex quantum circuit. This allows us to establish rigorous mathematical connections between entanglement properties and physical observables, proving both the existence of well-defined Yang-Mills theories and the presence of a non-zero mass gap.
Quantum Causal Structure
One of the most enduring puzzles in theoretical physics is reconciling quantum non-locality with relativistic causality. Quantum mechanics tells us that measuring one particle instantly affects the state of its distant partner—an effect that seems to require faster-than-light influence. Yet remarkably, this “spooky action at a distance," as Einstein famously called it, never allows us to send actual information faster than light.
This work explores the idea that causality itself is not fundamental, but emerges from more basic patterns of quantum information flow. Just as classical thermodynamics emerges from quantum statistical mechanics, classical causality (light cones) emerge naturally from quantum entanglement networks when considering large systems.
Using a framework that treats spacetime as a quantum information network, we see how quantum correlations can violate Bell inequalities while still respecting relativistic speed limits. This approach offers a resolution to long-standing paradoxes like the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment and quantum teleportation.
Quantum Extension to the Einstein Field Equations
One of physics' greatest challenges is unifying general relativity (Einstein's theory of gravity) with quantum mechanics (the physics of the very small). These two frameworks, while extraordinarily successful in their domains, have proven fundamentally incompatible when brought together.
One plausible path involves incorporating quantum informational measures - specifically entanglement entropy and quantum complexity - directly into Einstein's field equations. Entanglement entropy measures quantum correlations between systems, while quantum complexity captures how difficult it is to transform one quantum state into another.
By including these quantum informational terms in the gravitational equations, we get potential solutions to longstanding problems like:
The black hole information paradox - explaining how information that falls into black holes can be preserved
The nature of dark energy - providing a quantum explanation for the universe's accelerated expansion
The quantum structure of spacetime - suggesting how space and time emerge from quantum phenomena
This approach makes testable predictions about gravitational waves, black hole properties, and cosmic expansion that could be verified with next-generation observatories and experiments. The central insight is that quantum information might be fundamental to the fabric of reality itself - that the structure of spacetime may be encoded in the quantum correlations and complexity of the underlying systems.
Foundations of Holographic Quantum Computation
Traditional quantum computers face several fundamental challenges. They struggle with maintaining quantum states due to errors from environmental interference (decoherence), require substantial overhead for error correction, and have difficulty implementing complex quantum algorithms efficiently. These challenges have limited the practical development of large-scale quantum computers.
The central insight of my work is that by encoding quantum information using principles from the holographic theory of spacetime (specifically the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory correspondence), we can achieve several remarkable advantages. Rather than adding error correction as an extra layer on top of quantum operations, the holographic framework builds error resilience directly into the geometric structure of the system.
Quantum Circuit Complexity as a Physical Observable
Quantum circuit complexity—traditionally viewed as a purely computational property—may be best recognized as a fundamental physical quantity in nature, similar to energy or momentum.
In quantum computing, circuit complexity measures how many elementary operations (quantum gates) are needed to perform a specific transformation. My research establishes a rigorous mathematical framework demonstrating that complexity satisfies all requirements of a legitimate physical observable in quantum mechanics.
The key insight of this work is that complexity isn't just a practical concern for building quantum computers—it appears to be woven into the fabric of physical law itself. Through connections with gauge theory and the holographic principle, I show that complexity plays a crucial role in quantum gravity, potentially explaining aspects of black hole physics and the emergence of spacetime geometry.
This perspective suggests that computational requirements may constitute physical laws as fundamental as energy conservation. Just as Einstein revealed that space and time are aspects of a unified spacetime, computation and physical reality may be deeply interconnected, with complexity serving as a bridge between quantum information theory and fundamental physics.
The Emergence of Time from Quantum Information Dynamics
Rather than being a fundamental aspect of reality, it’s possible that time emerges from underlying quantum processes—specifically, from the growth of quantum complexity and the evolution of entanglement entropy in physical systems.
This paper posits that what we experience as the "flow of time" corresponds to increasing complexity in quantum systems. As quantum states become more complex and entangled, this manifests as what we perceive as time passing. This perspective helps bridge quantum mechanics and general relativity, potentially resolving well-known puzzles in physics like the black hole information paradox and the arrow of time.
This framework suggests that the fabric of reality may be information rather than space, time, or matter—aligning with physicist John Wheeler's famous "it from bit" proposition. If correct, the implications extend beyond theoretical physics to our understanding of cosmic inflation, dark energy, and even beginnings of the universe.
Complexity Considerations in the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
The traditional Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states there's a fundamental limit to how precisely properties like position and momentum of quantum particles can be simultaneously measured. This research proposes that this uncertainty can also be influenced by the complexity of the quantum state being measured.
The central idea is that more complex quantum states - those requiring more computational steps to create or describe - inherently introduce additional measurement uncertainties beyond what Heisenberg originally identified. This paper develops a mathematical framework that quantifies this relationship, showing how the traditional uncertainty limit should be supplemented with terms that account for quantum complexity.
This perspective bridges quantum mechanics and information theory in a new way, potentially offering a more complete understanding of the fundamental limits of measurement in the quantum world.
Observer Dependence in P vs NP
The P vs NP problem remains one of the most significant unsolved challenges in theoretical computer science, with profound implications for mathematics, cryptography, and our understanding of computation itself. This paper introduces a novel perspective that reframes the entire question through the lens of general relativity.
Traditional approaches to P vs NP have sought an absolute answer – either these complexity classes are equal or they aren't. Despite decades of effort by leading mathematicians and computer scientists, the problem has resisted resolution. This impasse suggests we may need to reconsider our fundamental assumptions about computational complexity.
This work explores the possibility that computational complexity, like other physical quantities in relativity, can be observer-dependent. We show how the same computational problem could be exponentially difficult for an observer in flat spacetime, yet solvable in polynomial time for an observer near a strong gravitational field.
This gravitational approach creates a natural "phase transition" in computational complexity, where P=NP becomes true only beyond a critical gravitational threshold. This framework draws upon concepts from computer science, general relativity, and quantum mechanics to provide a coherent picture of computation as a physical process embedded in spacetime.
Geometric Holographic Memory: Efficient and Error-resilient Data Storage
This paper introduces geometric holographic memory, a novel framework for data storage based on encoding information in geometric structures with topological properties. As digital information continues to grow exponentially, conventional storage technologies face fundamental physical limitations in capacity, reliability, and efficiency.
Traditional storage systems like magnetic and solid-state drives are approaching their physical limits. These technologies struggle with susceptibility to physical degradation and increasing costs as they scale. Our work builds on recent advances in geometric information theory, topological systems, and holographic principles to address these limitations.
From a mathematical standpoint, encoding information in geometric structures characterized by topological invariants provides inherent stability against local perturbations. This framework of quantum computation provides natural error correction through topological protection, eliminating the need for active error-checking mechanisms. This means significantly higher storage density and reduced energy requirements due to passive protection mechanisms.
A Fundamental Energy-complexity Uncertainty Relation
It is increasingly suggested by modern physics that circuit complexity—essentially, how difficult it is to perform a quantum computation—functions as a fundamental physical property, similar to energy or momentum.
This paper works out an "energy-complexity uncertainty relation," which mathematically demonstrates that energy and complexity are linked by a fundamental constraint similar to Heisenberg's famous uncertainty principle. In simple terms: the more precisely one tries to control the complexity of a quantum system, the more energy fluctuations must be accepted, and vice versa.
If correct, this relationship implies strict physical limits on how quickly complexity can grow in any quantum system, including quantum computers and even black holes. For quantum computing, it defines absolute speed limits that cannot be overcome regardless of future technological advances. For black holes, it explains why they're the fastest information "scramblers" in nature and helps resolve long-standing paradoxes about how information behaves around them. Most fascinating of all, however, is the suggestion that computational requirements may be as fundamental to our universe as energy conservation or causality.
Contact Me
Feel free to reach out anytime